1. For this module, I chose to focus on
comparing and contrasting business & industry, military, and healthcare
education.
An instructional designer in the
business world must deal with fast-paced technology-driven goals and projects that
may expand globally. An instructional designer very often will work on a team, which
may be a physical or virtual team. Some constraints that instructional
designers face are limited time and resources, “locus of control for
decision-making” (Reiser, 2012, p. 181), and tools or techniques that may not
have been tested for accuracy or effectiveness. In addition, an instructional
designer’s own beliefs and theoretical perspectives can conflict with other
members of the team or job productivity. An instructional designer must aim to
complete training in less time across cultures while positively impacting
company profits.
Instructional designers in the military
field are immersed in rapidly growing technological advancements. They must be
very knowledgeable in the instructional technology field. The future trends of
the military involve international responsibilities and the evolution of
technology. Instructional designers must also consider how to best utilize available
money, and may have to make “trade-off decisions” in order to stay within
budget (Reiser, 2012, p. 189). Instructional designers working for the military
must also have knowledge of learning theories and instructional strategies. They
must take into consideration cultural and learning differences among clients
and trainees, which includes examining and analyzing the knowledge and skills
of a target audience and offering remediation strategies. The environment in
which they work can range from a classroom, to virtual, to wherever
personnel are deployed. Reiser (2012) notes that an instructional designer’s
job for the military differ from that of a business in a variety of ways: “management,
configurations, implementation, and expertise of training instructors” (p.
190).
Health care education is varied
because the field is very broad. Education transitioned from that of
observation and speculation, to basic information learning, to more rigorous
problem-based learning. Because erroneous healthcare education could be detrimental,
educational programs are constantly being evaluated and researched. Hands-on
learning and simulations are ideal because of the need to constantly solve
problems and look for patterns. Some factors that affect healthcare performance
and education is the rapid advancement of knowledge. The rising costs of health
care also put pressure on faculty to spend more time in the office with patients
and less time teaching and training. Imposed regulations and standards dictate
what personnel should be learning, which could conflict with current curriculum
and examinations. The instructional designer and healthcare industry are also
faced with the rapid evolution of technologies.
In my field of P-12 education, I can
see many similarities. In all of the above mentioned fields and P-12 education,
instructional designers, teacher, and students are faced with the rapid evolution of technology. As
more technology becomes available within budgets, more technology can be
integrated into lesson design. Like the aforementioned fields, an instructional
designer must first analyze and evaluate the different skills and knowledge of
the students. Also like the fields above, especially military and healthcare,
problem-based learning is seen as a relevant and effective learning technique. Preparing
learners for future advances in technology is also important to P-12 learning. However,
Reiser points out that a “report from the U.S. Department of Commerce revealed
that education is ranked as the least technology-intensive enterprise among
fifty-five U.S. industry sectors” (Reiser, 2012, p. 213). Society is challenged
with educating today’s youth and teachers to use technology more effectively
and universally “as our nation attempts to address global changes to ensure
economic stability, international competitiveness, and the welfare of its
citizens” (Reiser, 2012, p. 214). Instructional designers in this field are critically
needed to help close the gap of technology integration.
2. In order to prepare out youth to address the problems of
living in a world with 9 billion people and limited resources, I feel like we
need to reiterate and reinforce the complications and detriments that will come
with continued waste. I think there are many programs that already do this,
whether they be television stations like KERA that play quality children’s
programming that address these issues to P-12 and higher education to
organizations like Greenpeace.
Instructing our students to use technology is one way to prepare them for the future. There are some good practices in Japan that I think we
should be more mindful of. One of those practices is allowing teachers be
creative in developing their own teaching methodologies. Teachers, according to
my own observation, come into the profession because they feel like they have
something to offer. Taking away their ideas and replacing them with mandated
practices stifles creativity and enthusiasm. I also thought it was interesting
that the wisdom of older, more experienced teachers is respected. In America, I
feel like sometimes we do not respect the wisdom or advice of educators who have
been teaching for a long time.
Something that is not required in Japan is renewal of the “IT
Basics” certification a teacher must have in order to be licensed. In Korea,
however, it is expected that educators “will continually receive training, not
only in ICT skills but in e-learning development, online collaboration, IDT,
and knowledge community building” (Reiser, 2012, p. 244). Korea has high
expectations for ICT-based learning and teacher performance in instructional
design. Something that American schools should adopt are higher expectations
for teachers integrating technology in instruction, but also, like Korea,
offering in-service training to help teachers continuously renew and review
their knowledge and skills in IDT.
I feel that America’s current educational system is diverse.
Some states have higher standards than others. However, I do think that
teachers strive to foster higher-order thinking skills and problem-solving. I
think administrators realize that future generations will be inheriting a
fast-paced mess, and that we need to prepare them for the future.
References
Reiser, R. A. & Dempsey, J. V. (2012). Trends and issues in
instructional design and technology, 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
I think what is lacking in the P-12 fields is that we do not have the budgeting for training. They might bring in the technology, but the training for teachers is almost non existent. I feel this is what separates us form other fields. In the military, they spend the money and time to train, in the medical fields they would never let a doctor loose without having made sure they meet the standards in hours needed before they try out a new machine in surgery. Why are we not doing the same for teachers?
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said about having to analyze the skills of students first as teachers to better understand how we can use the technology we have. Our instruction must be based on what our students can be successful with. I also think that p-12 education needs more training on the technology so we can adapt it for our specific classroom needs!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. I believe that television stations offer children programs that can help with issues in the world. For example discovery channel and history channel also play a educated role, but the problem Is that the students interest in these programs is very low, when they come to school in the morning and if you play a doucumentry program for them they get sleepy and board. They will spend hours watching epesodes of interest or face booking but to get them to watch an educational program they are not interested. We have to find ways to make them be good problem solvers and involve them in creative activities.
ReplyDeleteI also liked how Japan allows teachers to create their own methodology! I was impressed when I read that they require teachers to have IT basics before even beginning teaching! That is something that I think the US needs to require of future teachers in their undergrad program AND with current teachers. At times I don't think it's just enough to have professional development sessions on a new app or a new tool to use in our classroom, because for the majority of teachers it is not used. We have to find a way to make our teachers who are not interested in technology more excited about it! I think we could implement some things from many countries to make our education system much better!
ReplyDelete